<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cherp, A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A. Watt</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vinichenko, V.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SEA and strategy formation theories: From three Ps to five Ps</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Environmental Impact Assessment Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Emergent strategy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sea</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Strategic initiatives</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Strategy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Strategy formation theories</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007//</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.05.008</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">27</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">624 - 644</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">0195-9255</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A transition to environmentally sustainable societies should involve a significant and comprehensive — strategic — change. Much of the promise of SEA is associated precisely with its perceived capacity to facilitate such a strategic transformation by influencing selected ‘strategic decisions’. This paper examines the potential effectiveness and limitations of such an approach in light of contemporary organizational strategy theories. Most of these theories separate ‘strategies’ from ‘decisions’ and also transcend the notion of strategies as formal plans, policies and programs (PPPs). Instead, they consider strategies as “five Ps”, adding “Position”, “Perspective”, “Pattern” and “Ploy” to the “Plan”. Lessons from organizational strategy formation give rise to the following challenges for SEA theory and practice:1.How to assess and influence informal as well as formal aspects of strategic initiatives?2.How to extend SEA ‘beyond decisions’ to address ‘emergent strategies’ where strategic action is not necessarily preceded by a decision?3.How to ensure that knowledge provided as a result of SEA is strategically relevant and communicated to key players in strategy formation?4.How to deal with an uncontrollable and unpredictable environment in which strategic initiatives unfold?5.How to recognize those situations when SEA can have most strategic influence?</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></issue><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Accession Number: 12498436; Authors: Cherp, Aleh 1 Watt, Alan 2 Vinichenko, Vadim 3; Author Affiliations: 1: Central European University, Hungary and International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University, Sweden 2: Central European University, Hungary 3: Ecoline Environmental Assessment Center, Russia</style></notes></record></records></xml>
